>The escrow company generally should do proper KYC work, and does fall under AML/CFT directives. I'm claiming that some of the escrow companies are only in bus

>The escrow company generally should do proper KYC work, and does fall under AML/CFT directives. I'm claiming that some of the escrow companies are only in business for a short period of time, only to pop up under a different name with one or two of the owners being different. Wouldn't that mitigate a lot of the risk of non compliance?