> The very first paragraph says that Trump wasn't under investigation. That was a central part of the conspiracy theory. That's not what the Washingtontimes wr

> The very first paragraph says that Trump wasn't under investigation. That was a central part of the conspiracy theory. That's not what the Washingtontimes wrote. That's a lot of words that could be been summed up as 'the FBI spied on the Trump campaign.' Was it legal, justified, moral? Those things are all debatable. I'm firmly on the side that a thin pretense such as 'foreign interference' is no justification for spying on a political campaign. > including the fact that the claims it was improper were investigated, and dismissed. What a surprise, the government found itself innocent. Unfathomable.