3 ms·
Their evidence consisted of more than web server logs. I personally don't think their claims matched their evidence but they did provide details about the explo
by dvogel 5y ago
Their evidence consisted of more than web server logs. I personally don't think their claims matched their evidence but they did provide details about the exploits found, corroborated by the FBI. The primary implant found on the DNC network had been linked by multiple other security companies to other hacks that were almost definitely carried out by Russia-affiliated hackers. These links have been well-documented and have supporting links in the Wikipedia article.
- busterarm 5y agoI'm much more in-the-know and connected to real world whitehats and blackhats than not just your average person but also your average infosec person. It's complete bullshit.
- AnimalMuppet 5y agoYou blame CrowdStrike for saying "trust us, we're experts", and then when someone argues with you, you say "trust me, I'm an expert".
- busterarm 5y agoNo not at all. Unlike CrowdStrike, I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything. You can believe me or not and I don't care. I've got my bonafides and I have no intention of doxxing myself. There's a lot of very clued in people on this board in lots of areas and nobody really owes you anything or needs to explain themselves. You can listen or not, it's up to you.
- tptacek 5y agoThis would be more credible if you hadn't tried to present a technical argument about Crowdstrike's analysis that was trivially refuted in a 2-line reply.
- busterarm 5y agoIt doesn't matter -- we're in a post truth era where political affiliation matters more than facts and every side will circle the wagons with their own. Evidence has become less credible than who is supplying it and why. Thanks though, I just won a $100 bet with the guy next to me that you'd be making a reply in this thread and here we are.