I don’t see the explanation here. You seem to be restating your position a few times in more words - I.e. that examples of resistance to foreign opposition are

I don’t see the explanation here. You seem to be restating your position a few times in more words - I.e. that examples of resistance to foreign opposition are not relevant, and that guns wouldn’t be relevant in then scenarios you can imagine. Can you try condensing the actual argument into a short paragraph? It’s not clear what scenario you are imagining in which the weapons wouldn’t help. How about just outlining the scenario you are thinking about clearly?