3 ms·
seems like a seething former exec trying to dunk on current leadership. Reality is that the former leadership team sold a bunch of lies about self-driving cars
by ren_engineer 5y ago
seems like a seething former exec trying to dunk on current leadership. Reality is that the former leadership team sold a bunch of lies about self-driving cars creating massive profits that never had a chance at working. Valuation would have never been that high if it wasn't for the AI self-driving cars being shilled
- pessimizer 5y agoAI self-flying cars
- Finnucane 5y agoThe AI pilot has been trained on all known routes and passenger volume statistics. You tell it to take you to Chicago, and it drops you in a field in Iowa.
- V-eHGsd_ 5y agothis is the answer right here. this is emil michael, the former exec who suggested smearing a reporter critical of uber (https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2014/11/uber-exec-suggests-opposition-research-on-journalists/ https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2014/11/uber-...). he was a cancer on the company and his "hey remember me" tweet is just sour grapes. worse, he's wrong; uber was trading above 60 for a while definitely putting their total valuation above 100B & the 2017 benchmark tweet said "within 2 years" making august 10 2021 the second year they had "missed this goal"