4 ms·
Agreed. You can't blame this on testing only on Macs, because it's bad on my Mac too.
by zippergz 5y ago
Agreed. You can't blame this on testing only on Macs, because it's bad on my Mac too.
- jaywalk 5y agoIt's bad on Mac, it's bad on Windows. What the hell did they use to develop and test this where it looked good?
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- arrakeen 5y agolooks fine to me on linux, surprisingly. though i doubt that the designers tested on a linux box with a tweaked fontconfig edit: here's a comparison with helvetica https://i.imgur.com/BJlHQhf.gif https://i.imgur.com/BJlHQhf.gif
- chociej 5y agoCSS is seeing this stack on FF for me: "TwitterChirp", -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif I'm getting Roboto on Linux which (a) looks great and (b) is very similar to the new font
- city41 5y agoAre you actually getting Chirp? Seems some Linux users are not. I'm on Chrome on Ubuntu 20 and I do get Chirp, and it looks quite bad IMO.
- arrakeen 5y agoyup TwitterChirp is the computed font according to firefox
- smnrchrds 5y agoHas to be a BeBox.
- babelfish 5y agoLooking good on iOS.
- perryizgr8 5y agoLooks good on my S10.
- bart_spoon 5y agoI'm on a Mac, and I'm not getting any issues. Perhaps its machine or OS version dependent? Or browser dependent?