To clarify, I didn't assume anything. The article says that breakthrough case were a given, but we were led to believe otherwise. My point is, the jabbed can c

To clarify, I didn't assume anything. The article says that breakthrough case were a given, but we were led to believe otherwise. My point is, the jabbed can carry and spread the virus. Less effectively perhaps, but none the less a carrier with no symptoms is to some extent more dangerous as they are unaware of their status and can likely think they're safe to in contact with more ppl. The idea that the unjabbed are only getting infected from the unjabbed simply isn't accurate. But that's the gist of the article - and the ongoing rub of many - there's simply too many mixed signals and otherwise lazy reporting and "leadership". People are not responding for a reason, actually plenty of good reasons. To ignore that is text book insanity.