If you google what is a git commit, almost nobody points this specialty out. This is also most likely what the above comment got wrong. So I don't disagree wit

If you google what is a git commit, almost nobody points this specialty out. This is also most likely what the above comment got wrong. So I don't disagree with you; if we're being pedantic, the commit hash never changes for the same commit [0]. I just pointed out that what someone without an in-depth knowledge of git would intuitively consider to be a commit can indeed have changing hashes. [0] There does not seem to be an authoritative definition for the git-type of commit, so I guess we need to go with "a commit is what git considers a commit".