Any law is enforced under pain of imprisonment. See: https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/06/enforcing-the-law-is-inherently-violent/488828/ https

Any law is enforced under pain of imprisonment. See: https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/06/enforcing-the-law-is-inherently-violent/488828/ https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/06/enforci... When such laws are used to prohibit mutually voluntary interactions between consenting adults, I think it's a human rights violation, and it is an accurate adjective to use, whether it's the CCP doing it to "maintain social harmony and political stability", or the USG doing it to "limit systemic risks to the financial system". >>In fact, we have already seen what happens when the financial industry is entirely deregulated multiple times worldwide. That is a revisionist account put out by some of the most powerful special interests in the world, who benefit from rampant gatekeeping/centralization of private financial interaction.