4 ms·
No one would take a vaccine which is still expérimental if it was not covid. Especially not the people who dont have consequence of it. Its normal young people
by mam3 5y ago
No one would take a vaccine which is still expérimental if it was not covid. Especially not the people who dont have consequence of it.
Its normal young people dont want it. They only take it because they are forced somehow (mandatory masking and other stuff).
The only debate worth it is how much you have to make it mandatory
- Mordisquitos 5y ago> No one would take a vaccine which is still expérimental if it was not covid. While that may sound intuitively true, what does a vaccine "being experimental" actually mean objectively? For a vaccine to be experimental can mean many subtly different things depending on the context, and the currently deployed COVID-19 vaccines are only "experimental" with regards to the legal and customary fictions of the official procedures that are ordinarily in place for novel medications. These procedures have a reason to exist, of course, but they do not determine any objective fact about the reality of our current knowledge about these vaccines. To rest ones trust on these vaccines on them being officially "experimental" or not is to fall into the fallacy of reification.
- mam3 5y ago> These procedures have a reason to exist, of course, but they do not determine any objective fact about the reality of our current knowledge about these vaccines. It's still in phase 2 or 3. it has to be beyond 4. The reason is that indeed, theses rules were put in place because it was "assessed" that this delay was necessary to proprely evaluate thre effects of drugs, based probably on past problems. As such ou "current konwledge about these vaccines" is incomplete