3 ms·
Completely agree. Just to point out the logic you are using, for each factor that you deem relevant (i.e. now bile in addition to beauty), an exhaustive combina
by orky56 15y ago
Completely agree. Just to point out the logic you are using, for each factor that you deem relevant (i.e. now bile in addition to beauty), an exhaustive combination of factors will be the minimum viable strategy since it will fit better. I could continue to list additional factors in addition to these two and those additional ones would also be part of the minimum viable strategy.
- jacques_chester 15y agoThe point I guess I was making was that this is part of the minimum viable strategy because Hotelling's Law applies only weakly in the voluntary voting case.