2 ms·
> SO we should focus the effort on convincing older/weaker to vaccinate and leave the Phds/young That was a perfectly reasonable argument when vaccine supply w
by lucozade 5y ago
> SO we should focus the effort on convincing older/weaker to vaccinate and leave the Phds/young
That was a perfectly reasonable argument when vaccine supply was limited and there was a huge number of older/weaker people needing vaccines. And that was, in fact, the approach that almost all countries took at the early stages of vaccine rollout.
But it's not a good argument now. At least not in the countries with high uptake. As the vaccines aren't 100% effective, reducing transmissibility will save lives. Still.
And it is absolutely true that the young are much less likely to get severely affected from catching COVID. And that, in a nutshell, is also likely to be the primary reason for lower uptake in the young. It doesn't affect them so they don't really care. It's an entirely rational approach, if somewhat selfish.
- mam3 5y agoBut then you are walking on 50 years of ethics and clinical trial laws which are here for a reason... if it was not covid no one woukd take a vaccine that early. > It's an entirely rational approach, if somewhat selfish. The only selfish thing is older people who say "young people should take it to protect older people". Its like saying its selfish you dont work for me for free. My body my choice. Vaccine yourself if you want.