I think your assessment of fact is mostly reasonable, but claiming that Google has no power to censor him is a stretch. Google is a primary driver of informatio

I think your assessment of fact is mostly reasonable, but claiming that Google has no power to censor him is a stretch. Google is a primary driver of information discovery, and this is an act not just of inhibiting discovery but one of making it unavailable. Rand Paul is an MD elected member of congress. Even if he were not an MD, his argumentation is representative of the people. This is egregious. I think anything said in congress should be retained, and I welcome any opposing argument.