I would argue two points here: - Switching the world to nuclear power would require global cooperation, hundreds of billions of dollars, and 20+ years of const

I would argue two points here: - Switching the world to nuclear power would require global cooperation, hundreds of billions of dollars, and 20+ years of construction - Things are already quite bad Now, I don't want to start messing with the earth's albedo all willy nilly. But if our climate models suggest that this could be a viable stopgap that can be deployed for less than we spend on corn subsidies, then we should do it.