4 ms·
Hey, I'm in a city that sits either on the tail end of 2nd tier or the high end of 3rd, I suppose, so I sincerely don't mean to dig at Omaha too hard, and I hav
by handrous 5y ago
Hey, I'm in a city that sits either on the tail end of 2nd tier or the high end of 3rd, I suppose, so I sincerely don't mean to dig at Omaha too hard, and I have no problem whatsoever with Nebraska (it's not the kind of basket-case on public policy that certain other states are—hell, mine's probably worse, as far as that goes). I actually find cities about Omaha's size more pleasant than larger (or smaller) ones. I've just noticed in looking into moving to some cities about that size (including Omaha, specifically, in fact) certain patterns—but, yes, there exist better jobs than the stereotype I mentioned, in Omaha, and, in fact, jobs that bad exist here, too, which I know because I've accidentally interviewed for them a couple times, but higher-paying ones are in much better supply, too.
The housing thing's just a kind of indicator for a certain kind of situation, which is that, pretty much by definition, either upper-quintile earners are very rare in a city, or the house happens to be somewhere (as in, a specific region of the city) that kinda sucks for, usually, multiple reasons. Or both.
Typically, you hit up Zillow and start getting excited about the abundance of crazy-cheap, gorgeous, giant houses in a smallish city... it's time to check the city's household income curve, and look into the schools where all these great houses are.
> In fact, one of the most common things heard when you inquire about private schools is "Sure, but why pay twice for the same education?"
On that topic specifically, I think it's an under-appreciated fact that most private schools are kind of bad. How can that be, even when you exclude the ones that exist mainly to teach the kids creationism instead of evolution? Fuck if I know. You'd think the market would put them out of business in a hurry, but, nope. I mean, the best schools in an area are also not-uncommonly (but far from always) private schools, but lots of them are, at best, on par with the public schools nearby.
- greedo 5y agoAbout private schools. At least where I live, people either send their kids to the Catholic schools, or to the creationist type. There's a decent bunch of Lutheran schools as well, but I don't know anyone who sends their kids to those.
- mercutio2 5y agoI'm with you on a lot of your argument (there's a reason 3rd and 4th tier city real estate is inexpensive compared to big cities), but, sidebar: What do you mean by a "bad" school? As far as I can tell, most people mean one of three things: - The test scores aren't as high as I'd like, or - There are students who are more rowdy than I'd like - I disagree with the syllabus Plus a dollop of: - My kid is profoundly gifted and the school doesn't offer challenging enough material I empathize with this last one, at least, if that's what your situation is, but I know a lot of rich families that think their kid is profoundly gifted and actually they're just bog-standard moderately-gifted, which usually doesn't require nearly the same investment by the school as parents seem to think. The other three barely matter for your kid's educational attainment. They seem much more about parents being super invested in having a certain social class for their kids peer group. If so, fair enough, but I don't think that's a "bad school" so much as "undesirable peer group".