3 ms·
Yes, I think your sentence is fallacy (I am not the one who gave you downvotes). And at the same time that is reason why UK is trying so hard to hide taking par
by NiceWayToDoIT 5y ago
Yes, I think your sentence is fallacy (I am not the one who gave you downvotes). And at the same time that is reason why UK is trying so hard to hide taking part in slavery and oppression during the imperialistic conquest. Genocide is a genocide regardless of the period of time.
Some say that reparation cost to Jamaica because of the slavery would cost trillions, which of course UK does not, or will ever have any plans to do.
Also NATO waging wars around the globe was never legal or just, we were just going for oil and other resources using "shortcut". During NATO imperialistic conquest we have international laws and UN, but it seems that international organisation has more decorative purpose than anything else equally goes for Russia and China. Russia's war dogs would never be in Libya if we have not had destroyed that country first. During Roman empire at least they created roads, aqueducts, they gave writing system, what good did NATO give to any of those middle east countries?
- throwrqX 5y agoWhat evidence is there for NATO chasing oil or other resources?