5 ms·

Disney+ had inexplicably blocked my IP address for "being a VPN" for close to year, despite me never running a VPN from my home network. Though the block didn't

Disney+ had inexplicably blocked my IP address for "being a VPN" for close to year, despite me never running a VPN from my home network. Though the block didn't stop me from watching their content, it just stopped me from paying for, which I was more than willing to do and spent far to long dealing with their support to try to make it happen. If the same thing happens with Netflix, it also won't keep me from watching Netflix content, I'll just stop paying for it. Other than the aforementioned Disney+ content, I rarely pirate anything these days and I'd rather not if I can help it.

deleted 5y ago
[deleted]
brundolf 5y ago
> If the same thing happens with Netflix, it also won't keep me from watching Netflix content, I'll just stop paying for it The Disney+ one sounded like a (hilarious) bug in their logic. Not sure why that would translate to Netflix Edit: I may have misunderstood. I thought Disney+ was blocking the user from paying for Disney+ but not from streaming Disney+. I missed the implication that they started pirating the content.
- majormajor 5y ago
  There are companies who sell lists of suspected VPN IPs. If Disney+ and Netflix used the same list, you could get blocked from both.
- dmurray 5y ago
  I don't think it's a hilarious bug in their logic, just collateral damage in the war between VPN providers and Disney/Netflix/etc. The VPN providers try to get IP ranges that look like residential IPs. Ideally they rent them from the same ISPs who really do provide residential service. By the nature of the traffic, Disney can't tell for sure that it's coming from a VPN - just something like "a suspiciously large number of users connected from this range, especially users who currently seem to be travelling internationally". Perhaps the user had a dynamic IP address and kept getting one in the same range that was also used for VPNs. Perhaps he had a static one but Disney banned ranges by the /28 instead of individual addresses.
  - 3np 5y ago
    Not only that, some VPN providers run through actual residential IPs acquired through browser extensions, apps, and smart devices.
    - TedDoesntTalk 5y ago
      Some official NordVPN clients turn your device into a proxy server which the other side of the NordVPN business (OxyLabs) sells to other customers.
      - alacritas0 5y ago
        Do you have a source to support that claim?
        3np 5y ago
        I don't have time to dig up anything authoritative right now, but I assumed this was common knowledge and uncontroversial. It is precisely this kind of practices (reusing/selling/buying user and customer IPs - there are companies that specialize as brokers) that allows them their low prices while generally not getting blocked by services like Netflix, and I suspect it's also what's behind the move from NF.
        dmurray 5y ago
        > there are companies that specialize in brokers... You're describing a botnet here. There are certainly organizations that will sell you access to their botnet, but I wouldn't describe them as uncontroversial, and I'd like to learn about ones that are structured as companies or that have as authoritative a reach as NordVPN.
        3np 5y ago
        Luminati, for one. The mentioned OxyLabs, for another. I'm not saying this by itself is anything illegal - users generally unwittingly agree to it through wall-of-text ToS.
- DrBenCarson 5y ago
  For anyone else who also read it as a big: the Disney+ user above torrented (most likely) the Disney content while not being a customer (a decision that was taken out of his hands). I agree--they're not denying me their content, they're denying my payment. If this is really where they want to go, they know how it ends (read: someone disrupts their model and they get left in the dust).
stefan_ 5y ago
Maybe you just didn't realize? A lot of Chrome extensions are now backdoored with Infatica spyware that literally turns your browser into a proxy for.. whoever: https://infatica.io/ https://infatica.io/ It's beyond me how Google doesn't scan for this and bring the hammer down. Too busy refining modal popups from iframes I guess.
- userbinator 5y ago
  On the other hand, if everyone looks like they're running a VPN, then maybe the companies will be forced not to discriminate. (Although I suppose the same disclaimers about running a Tor exit node apply.)
  - jandrese 5y ago
    Spoiler alert: they will still discriminate. It's not like Netflix enjoys making it a PITA to use their service, but the people who on the content care a great deal about it. They leverage these disparities to maximize their cash flow.
- TedDoesntTalk 5y ago
  Some NordVPN clients turn your device into a proxy server which the other side of the NordVPN business (OxyLabs) sells to other customers.
  - quenix 5y ago
    Is this true? I use NordVPN clients on my Mac and iOS device. Could you point to a source for this?
- cxcorp 5y ago
  Same as Bright Data (https://brightdata.com/ https://brightdata.com/), formerly Luminati Networks, who apparently use or used HolaVPN customers [1] as exit nodes for their proxy networks and data collection infrastructure. Their current website sheds some light into how they get their residential and mobile IPs [2] (emphasis mine): > Bright Data attains its peers (Residential and Mobile IPs) through the Bright SDK, which is integrated into applications as another form of app monetization. > App users are presented with the option to opt-in to the Bright Data Network and become a peer (share their device idle resources) in exchange for an ad-free or free application. All peers sharing resources with the Bright Data residential network have personally opted-in and may opt-out at any time. It would be nice to know which applications have their SDK integrated, so I could avoid them. [1]: https://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/hk-en/security/news/cybercrime-and-digital-threats/shining-a-light-on-the-risks-of-holavpn-and-luminati https://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/hk-en/security/news/cybercr... [2]: https://brightdata.com/ethical https://brightdata.com/ethical

deleted 5y ago

[deleted]

brundolf 5y ago

> If the same thing happens with Netflix, it also won't keep me from watching Netflix content, I'll just stop paying for it The Disney+ one sounded like a (hilarious) bug in their logic. Not sure why that would translate to Netflix Edit: I may have misunderstood. I thought Disney+ was blocking the user from paying for Disney+ but not from streaming Disney+. I missed the implication that they started pirating the content.

majormajor 5y ago
There are companies who sell lists of suspected VPN IPs. If Disney+ and Netflix used the same list, you could get blocked from both.
dmurray 5y ago
I don't think it's a hilarious bug in their logic, just collateral damage in the war between VPN providers and Disney/Netflix/etc. The VPN providers try to get IP ranges that look like residential IPs. Ideally they rent them from the same ISPs who really do provide residential service. By the nature of the traffic, Disney can't tell for sure that it's coming from a VPN - just something like "a suspiciously large number of users connected from this range, especially users who currently seem to be travelling internationally". Perhaps the user had a dynamic IP address and kept getting one in the same range that was also used for VPNs. Perhaps he had a static one but Disney banned ranges by the /28 instead of individual addresses.
- 3np 5y ago
  Not only that, some VPN providers run through actual residential IPs acquired through browser extensions, apps, and smart devices.
  - TedDoesntTalk 5y ago
    Some official NordVPN clients turn your device into a proxy server which the other side of the NordVPN business (OxyLabs) sells to other customers.
    - alacritas0 5y ago
      Do you have a source to support that claim?
      - 3np 5y ago
        I don't have time to dig up anything authoritative right now, but I assumed this was common knowledge and uncontroversial. It is precisely this kind of practices (reusing/selling/buying user and customer IPs - there are companies that specialize as brokers) that allows them their low prices while generally not getting blocked by services like Netflix, and I suspect it's also what's behind the move from NF.
        dmurray 5y ago
        > there are companies that specialize in brokers... You're describing a botnet here. There are certainly organizations that will sell you access to their botnet, but I wouldn't describe them as uncontroversial, and I'd like to learn about ones that are structured as companies or that have as authoritative a reach as NordVPN.
        3np 5y ago
        Luminati, for one. The mentioned OxyLabs, for another. I'm not saying this by itself is anything illegal - users generally unwittingly agree to it through wall-of-text ToS.
DrBenCarson 5y ago
For anyone else who also read it as a big: the Disney+ user above torrented (most likely) the Disney content while not being a customer (a decision that was taken out of his hands). I agree--they're not denying me their content, they're denying my payment. If this is really where they want to go, they know how it ends (read: someone disrupts their model and they get left in the dust).

stefan_ 5y ago

Maybe you just didn't realize? A lot of Chrome extensions are now backdoored with Infatica spyware that literally turns your browser into a proxy for.. whoever: https://infatica.io/ https://infatica.io/ It's beyond me how Google doesn't scan for this and bring the hammer down. Too busy refining modal popups from iframes I guess.

userbinator 5y ago
On the other hand, if everyone looks like they're running a VPN, then maybe the companies will be forced not to discriminate. (Although I suppose the same disclaimers about running a Tor exit node apply.)
- jandrese 5y ago
  Spoiler alert: they will still discriminate. It's not like Netflix enjoys making it a PITA to use their service, but the people who on the content care a great deal about it. They leverage these disparities to maximize their cash flow.
TedDoesntTalk 5y ago
Some NordVPN clients turn your device into a proxy server which the other side of the NordVPN business (OxyLabs) sells to other customers.
- quenix 5y ago
  Is this true? I use NordVPN clients on my Mac and iOS device. Could you point to a source for this?
cxcorp 5y ago
Same as Bright Data (https://brightdata.com/ https://brightdata.com/), formerly Luminati Networks, who apparently use or used HolaVPN customers [1] as exit nodes for their proxy networks and data collection infrastructure. Their current website sheds some light into how they get their residential and mobile IPs [2] (emphasis mine): > Bright Data attains its peers (Residential and Mobile IPs) through the Bright SDK, which is integrated into applications as another form of app monetization. > App users are presented with the option to opt-in to the Bright Data Network and become a peer (share their device idle resources) in exchange for an ad-free or free application. All peers sharing resources with the Bright Data residential network have personally opted-in and may opt-out at any time. It would be nice to know which applications have their SDK integrated, so I could avoid them. [1]: https://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/hk-en/security/news/cybercrime-and-digital-threats/shining-a-light-on-the-risks-of-holavpn-and-luminati https://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/hk-en/security/news/cybercr... [2]: https://brightdata.com/ethical https://brightdata.com/ethical