3 ms·
>> His statement was a dog whistle to his base. > Maybe it was. So what? It means he is being intellectually dishonest. He has a long history of such behavior
by crispyambulance 5y ago
>> His statement was a dog whistle to his base.
> Maybe it was. So what?
It means he is being intellectually dishonest. He has a long history of such behavior, and worse, he should know better.
- the_optimist 5y agoYou have assumed negative intent and damned it in the same sentence. You should conclude by agreeing with and patting yourself on the head.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]