4 ms·
So the whole proof is that he was there at the time? Shouldn't there be more proof especially that they are linking him to "all" the fires now?
by csomar 5y ago
So the whole proof is that he was there at the time? Shouldn't there be more proof especially that they are linking him to "all" the fires now?
- trynumber9 5y agoNo, just read it. That incident had nearby suspicious fire remants. Combined with his unusual behavior and similar car tracks being found at another fire was their basis for further tracking of the alleged arsonist.
- cyral 5y agoThe document is actually very interesting, it goes into great detail of exactly how they tracked him. There is so much evidence in it, really a good read. They ended up tracking him with a GPS tracker to prove he set the fire they charged him with.
- nawgz 5y agoReading the above comment, this was the necessary point to pull his cell phone info, not link him to "all" fires; after such a suspicious interaction, the warrant was granted to pull records, and the case strengthened further.
- dyslexit 5y ago> Forest Service agents also measured and recorded data about the tire tread pattern left by Maynard's car — evidence that they say ties him to a string of arson wildfires. That's linking his car to the fire. That's from the article, I'm sure the affidavit itself has more.
- spfzero 5y agoThe article points out that the person who first spotted the smoke also saw the man walking back from the location of the starting of the fire, about 10 minutes after it started. Now that they have a warrant and can track his movements, he is coincident with several other fire origins.