4 ms·
Yes, but crimes that have the potential to benefit people without hurting anyone else?
by dsmithn 15y ago
Yes, but crimes that have the potential to benefit people without hurting anyone else?
- gst 15y agoSome of them - not all. Just look at all those drug-related laws.
- wisty 15y agoDrugs still hurt people. DOSing a library doesn't. Obviously that depends on which drugs and how many, and maybe the laws are a little "one-size-fits-all" here.
- moonlighter 15y agoIt is just me, or does a 35 year old prison term sound CRAZY? Never mind the proposed monetary fine... the punishment just doesn't seem to fit the crime. It's outrageous. To put things into perspective... - Swartz, 24, faces 35 years in prison and a $1 million fine under the indictment. - Anders Breivik killed at least 76 people, and the maximum punishment under Norwegian law is 21 years (albeit with the option to extend it for 5 years each after that). Who committed the bigger and more serious crime here??
- smallblacksun 15y agoIts a false comparison due to different legal systems. In the US Breivik would be facing multiple life sentences or the death penalty.