I'm the person you find if you take the intersection of the sets of experts in accessibility and knowledgeable people about modern Transformer architectures and

I'm the person you find if you take the intersection of the sets of experts in accessibility and knowledgeable people about modern Transformer architectures and I feel like I fundamentally do not understand how you can reasonably claim to be doing what you're doing. Heuristic-based automatic remediation is one, not so great, thing. But trying to probabilistically remediate accessibility based on ... The huge corpus of inaccessible web content out there as a baseline? Or possibly a far-too-small annotated training set that can capture a tiny portion of what can go wrong with accessibility where it would make more sense to just build the darn heuristics... I must be missing something here. Also you might want to call this a Show HN.