3 ms·
The counterargument here being that blog post's title was so generic sounding as to potentially not bring enough attention to the importance of the issue. The
by mcphilip 15y ago
The counterargument here being that blog post's title was so generic sounding as to potentially not bring enough attention to the importance of the issue. The HN submission's original title didn't misrepresent the contents of the blog post in any way and helped attract more attention to the issue.
- dools 15y agoThat was basically what I said to pg - "I'm not want to tell me HN buddies about the Nissan Leaf, the interesting part is their use of HTML5 video to create an ad campaign that would have traditionally been the domain of Flash(TM)". pg's response was that if I want to share an editorial opinion about something, other than just posting the title of the page, then I should blog about it and then post a link to my blog.
- raldi 15y agoSeems like a good compromise would have been "Nissan uses HTML5 instead of Flash for their new Leaf campaign"