> Rights aren't universal, and no serious person argues this. There is always an emergency that's bad enough. I feel like this is the point of contention. Many

> Rights aren't universal, and no serious person argues this. There is always an emergency that's bad enough. I feel like this is the point of contention. Many people truly don't consider things that can be taken away a right. Is the constitution a suicide pact a serious question that has been argued in the US Supreme Court (that phrased originated by a justice arguing that it wasn't... he was in the minority opinion). I will try to keep this neutral, but people say things like "driving isn't a right, it's a priveledge"... what distinguishes between rights and priveledges?