I have been meaning to read those books. I have not read the first one either though. It's just the logic doesn't work out for me. Just because something was d

I have been meaning to read those books. I have not read the first one either though. It's just the logic doesn't work out for me. Just because something was doesn't mean something ought. So why is that seemingly always the presumed right path to pursue. Why do we always look to just make nature static to what it was 100s or 1000s of years ago?