4 ms·
Lots of misinformation on YouTube is bad for people and isn't stopped. And I would hardly call Google, YouTube's owners, a "company with a conscience" since nea
by mimixco 5y ago
Lots of misinformation on YouTube is bad for people and isn't stopped. And I would hardly call Google, YouTube's owners, a "company with a conscience" since nearly their entire business is based on predatory surveillance advertising.
In a democratic society, the elected leaders need to communicate their ideas, however wrongheaded. If they aren't allowed to communicate, how do they reach their electors and how do they tell potential voters they're right (or wrong)? When you are at the platform level like YouTube, you have a responsibility to carry information from the government even if you don't like it because you didn't elect Ron Paul, his constituents did.
- javajosh 5y agoYouTube is NOT the government. If Rand Paul was arrested for his speech, that would be a violation of his First Amendment rights and wrong. The right to speak does not compel a private platform to carry that speech. Certainly Fox News gives RP and his ilk plenty of opportunity to spread their harmful propaganda. So it's not like, even in a practical sense, his ability to express himself has been curtailed.
- lp0_on_fire 5y ago> Certainly Fox News gives RP and his ilk Tell us how you really feel about people on the right. Something tells me you'd be singing a different story if it were someone you agreed with.
- treeman79 5y agoLincoln was not even on the ballet In several states. That lead to a civil war.s We are reaching/past the point where open speech is no longer allowed. That makes next steps scary.
- rat87 5y agoYouTube doing the right thing and banning some stupid misinformation is nowhere near civil war.
- treeman79 5y agoMisinformation is the excuse. This is banning a political party on whatever reason they think they can get away with.
- selimthegrim 5y agoRand Paul is the GOP now? You might want to tell Trump that.
- AnimalMuppet 5y agoWell, they're also banning Trump... (Different "they", though - Twitter. But Twitter was Trump's main medium. Anyway, point is, once you raise the topic, yeah, it looks like treeman79 actually does have a bit of evidence on his side...)
- rat87 5y agohe does not. They're not banning a political party at all. They are banning some individuals for breaking the terms of service.