3 ms·
So what? It's easy to find a million articles that say whatever you need them to say. The point is that Youtube has decided which articles are "right" and "wro
by spiderice 5y ago
So what? It's easy to find a million articles that say whatever you need them to say. The point is that Youtube has decided which articles are "right" and "wrong", when they have no business deciding such things.
- fighterpilot 5y agoMy comment has nothing to do with whether Youtube should have the power to do what they've done. It has to do with the assertion in the GP that it's not misinformation to say unequivocally that cloth masks don't work. That appears to be nonsense since there's a handful of studies that at the very least leave open that question. Have a look at Fig 3.A from this study: https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/6/36/eabd3083 https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/6/36/eabd3083
- underseacables 5y agoTherefore they should lose sec 230 protections.
- b0sk 5y agoLosing sec 230 protections would mean more ban-hammer for lying politicians (about elections, vaccines etc.)
- lp0_on_fire 5y agoI'm fine with that. It would create an even playing field in theory and that's a hell of a lot better than what we have right now which is some politicans getting to lie with impunity and others having their content removed for wrongthink.
- bananabreakfast 5y agoHate speech is not "wrongthink". Don't defend racists by pretending they are just thinking outside the box.
- aleister_777 5y agoThere in-lies the problem. "Hate speech" is just speech you don't like or choose to be offended by. You have no problem with "hate speech" that suits you and your political worldview.
- AnimalMuppet 5y agoDon't defend the current situation by pretending that it's only hate speech and racism that are getting removed.