3 ms·
First, Isn't what he wants in medical studies completely standard practice? It probably is (I don't have a habit of reading medical articles.) But there are s
by lutorm 15y ago
First, Isn't what he wants in medical studies completely standard practice?
It probably is (I don't have a habit of reading medical articles.) But there are still people writing papers like "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False" (see http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/11/lies-damned-lies-and-medical-science/8269/ http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/11/lies-dam...) so it's not clear that implies that they have their shit together...
- kenjackson 15y agoThis is one of the problems with the perception of science -- which is that scientists always are right. They're not. Falsifying existing claims is part of science. If no claims were ever debunked then I'd be suspicious that it was more faith than science. With that said, sloppy research does happen. And Ioannidis has pointed this out. But pointing out that there's a high correlation between people who eat blueberries and IQ, in one study is useful. It's not a conclusive -- especially since there was no hypothesis going in. But it gives the pretext for double-blind studies. It advances science. Of course, there is also flat out corruption, which I have no answers for. That's just part of human life.