3 ms·

Can't imagine a negative second order affect of moving all government discussions to the public /s

• andy_ppp 5y ago
  Where did I say public - I meant available to the courts if required...
  • Symbiote 5y ago
    Isn't that already the requirement? Hence why Lord whatever is in trouble.
    • hkt 5y ago
      Not as severely as the GP suggested. It seems to be extremely common in govt now. To the point where actively requiring surveillance of personal devices of government officials seems pretty reasonable.
• WhyNotHugo 5y ago
  TBH, anything that a public official says in representation of the public should be a matter of public record.