3 ms·
There was a new yorker article about this http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2011/07/25/110725fa_fact_cassidy?printable=true¤tPage=all http://www.newyork
by rajpaul 15y ago
There was a new yorker article about this
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2011/07/25/110725fa_fact_cassidy?printable=true¤tPage=all http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2011/07/25/110725fa_fact_...
Transparency is an interesting theme in the New Yorker article. Dalio sees ego as being a major barrier to success. He makes efforts to create an organization where frank discussions can take place without emotions getting involved.
- Aykroyd 15y agoThe New Yorker article was really interesting. This other article's title is pretty annoying. The title is way too exaggerated. I'm tired of these "click-bait" calculations on the part of media outlets.
- rhizome 15y agoEgo minimization is a hallmark of cults, inflicting torture, and the military. What Dalio is looking for is a reliably top-down-authoritarian company.
- rajpaul 15y agoExcept that it isn't a cult. It is a company, where people are compensated, and free to leave. The comparison isn't serious, so don't take it that way.
- buff-a 15y agoComplaining about ego minimization is a hallmark of egos.
- rhizome 15y agoObservations aren't the same thing as complaints.
- buff-a 15y agoUsing logical fallacies[1] to complain, and then claiming that those remarks were merely "observations" is a hallmark of egos. [1] http://www.fallacyfiles.org/guiltbya.html
- jacques_chester 15y agoSaying that things are the hallmark of egos is a hallmark of egos.
- mdda 15y agoBut getting emotionally attached to particular positions (ideas/trades/etc) is a hallmark of the kind of money-losing paradoxes that humans get themselves into. Being able to step back and be self-critical is extremely important to trading well. Simple example : Suppose you bought Apple stock 2 years ago. It has been a home-run. Do you sell it now? (record your answer). Now look at the facts : You didn't actually buy the stock 2 years ago (most likely). If you said 'sell now' would you short Apple stock now? If you said hold, would aren't you really saying that you should buy it now? It's a trivial example (wrong in many small ways, illustrative as far as the first-order argument goes, IHMO). Of course, if the example is bad : tell me why. The whole point is that not attaching ego to the argument leads to a better discussion : And deeper understanding. And that's what the company is trying to get at.