4 ms·
I may be missing something, but it seems they are distributing a ported/patched GCC, which is GPL-licensed, under the MIT license?
by IfOnlyYouKnew 5y ago
I may be missing something, but it seems they are distributing a ported/patched GCC, which is GPL-licensed, under the MIT license?
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- Anunayj 5y agoWhen you run the .start.sh file, You're greeted with this message: This project also include the work of other projects. All trademarks are registered trademarks of their respective owners. They licenses may be found in the following files: - util/nanosvg.h - shared/stb_image.h, shared/stb_sprintf.h, shared/stb_ds.h and util/stb_truetype.h - res/Fonts/Hack License.txt, res/Fonts/Inter License.txt - res/Icons/elementary Icons License.txt - res/Media/Licenses.txt - Ported applications have their licenses in their respective folders.
- cxr 5y agoIt's not clear where the allegation "distributing a ported/patched GCC[...] under the MIT license" even comes from. That same notice appears in the file LICENSE.md (not that it would matter much even if it didn't).