3 ms·
> would be a slamdunk antitrust case If a not-profitable company is raising prices to not go out of business then idk how well that would play out in courts.
by vineyardmike 5y ago
> would be a slamdunk antitrust case
If a not-profitable company is raising prices to not go out of business then idk how well that would play out in courts.
Would a court force uber to go out of business instead of raising prices?
- dragonwriter 5y agoThe price raise would just be part of the evidence that the earlier low prices were anticompetitive dumping to monopolize and maintain a monopoly on the market, the remedy for illegally protecting the monopoly would probably not be prohibition on raising rates, though. Breakup or other remedies would be possible.