3 ms·
I agree. I have read it all to really learn not that much (animal cognition is a pet peeve of mine) until this paragraph. I don't know anymore if we should sal
by xcambar 5y ago
I agree. I have read it all to really learn not that much (animal cognition is a pet peeve of mine) until this paragraph.
I don't know anymore if we should salute the efforts of the author to contextualize the news, to the detriment of the news itself, or I'd we should blame them for lengthening artificially the article...
Probably a bit of both, as always.
That being said, thanks for the summary of the article, great tl;dr; ;)
- OJFord 5y agoPet peeve?
- xcambar 5y agoOh no! Not a pet peeve! I always thought pet peeve meant a hobby, a specific point of interest, not something you dislike! Sorry for the mistake, I'm glad I've fixed this though! :D
- edgyquant 5y agoWhy do you hate animal cognition ?
- xcambar 5y agoOh no! Not a pet peeve! I always thought pet peeve meant a hobby, a specific point of interest, not something you dislike! Sorry for the mistake, I'm glad I've fixed this though! :D
- peterburkimsher 5y agoSaying "thank you" and upvoting is encouraging, and makes communities stronger. Blaming people is discouraging, and divides communities. Criticise the article, not the author, and thank the author for what they got right (a good topic for discussion) so they'll create more in future. We can also increase trust in the community using links. Mentioning names in a good way is particularly helpful, like academic citations. Thank you for finishing with the "great tl;dr", xcambar, you're asking the right questions :)