> I assume when people talk about “ultra-processed” they’re talking about foods which 90% would agree are bad for you So then we should just call it what it i

> I assume when people talk about “ultra-processed” they’re talking about foods which 90% would agree are bad for you So then we should just call it what it is: junk food. "ultra-processed" is no better than "gmo", i.e. a completely meaningless label designed to scare people because of spooky "technology", as opposed to actual information people can use to make informed decisions. > Maybe we could call it “junk” food but that’s even more ambiguous. LOL... damn, okay, I admit it, I didn't read all the way to the end before commenting. I'm leaving this here as it's a good reminder for myself to slow down...