3 ms·
> the developer didn't even bother making a binary because they don't want to build it for 5+ different packaging formats No snark intended, but how much did y
by scns 5y ago
> the developer didn't even bother making a binary because they don't want to build it for 5+ different packaging formats
No snark intended, but how much did you pay for the software?
- AnIdiotOnTheNet 5y agoHow can snark not be intended? The point of the statement wasn't to badmouth developers for not making a Linux binary, it was to criticize the state of application deployment on Linux being so terrible that a developer didn't want to bother making a binary for it. That's true regardless of the cost of the software. Linux Desktop doesn't get to be all "please use me, I'm great!" and "well, what do you want for free?" at the same time.