4 ms·

this article is written with the obvious intention of bashing google, the writer didn't even do his research because honeycomb 3.2 source is available.

• tsuraan 15y ago
  Where? http://source.android.com/ http://source.android.com/ just says 2.3 is available, and google isn't turning up anything either. EDIT: looks like the GPL/LGPL parts have been released (according to news reports, anyhow). Can you point me to a full buildable android 3.2 repo?
  • darshan 15y ago
    Only the GPL/LGPL parts are available, but the Honeycomb code isn't viewed as ready for public consumption yet. My guess is that we'll finally see the code when Ice Cream Sandwich rolls out.
    • jackolas 15y ago
      Some openness. Waiting for corporations to deem it fit for public scrutiny but not public usage? Makes me suspicious if they released all the GPL'd parts or if they missed some.
    • starwed 15y ago
      Sure, but that was exactly what the author meant.
• mrpollo 15y ago
  "this article is written with the obvious intention of bashing google" i agree, it is way faster to develop for just 1 browser, plus we should be celebrating people are trying to break ground doing this awesome videos, i can only begin to imagine all the impressive work that what went into this video, good one google +1
  • bonch 15y ago
    I thought the point of open standards was that you didn't develop for just one browser. Google loves to trumpet its openness a lot, so forgive me for being confused by their motives.
  • zobzu 15y ago
    I hope this was sarcastic, unfortunately I fear you're actually serious. Scary.
    • mrpollo 15y ago
      out of curiosity why?
• Toady 15y ago
  Oh, okay, so that makes it okay for the site to be Chrome-only despite Google's constant proselytizing over "openness."