4 ms·

Aggressively clone as in...? A top statusbar? A touchscreen? A virtual keyboard? A grid layout of applications? Custom applications? Hate to break it to you, bu

Aggressively clone as in...? A top statusbar? A touchscreen? A virtual keyboard? A grid layout of applications? Custom applications? Hate to break it to you, but iOS wasn't the first to do any of those, Android included most of them before the iPhone announcement (from the little that we know of its development at Google beginning in 2005), and the first Android phone (G1) didn't resemble the iPhone more than any other smartphone on the market. Most people that I knew were comparing it to the Sidekick when it first released.

Steko 15y ago
"Aggressively clone as in...? " As in completely overhauled the device from a blackberry knock off to an iphone knock off: http://random.andrewwarner.com/what-googles-android-looked-like-before-and-after-the-launch-of-iphone/ http://random.andrewwarner.com/what-googles-android-looked-l... "Hate to break it to you, but iOS wasn't the first to do any of those" I'm not making any claim that (1) iOS was first for any of those or that (2) whatever claims Apple is making are protectable or not or (3) whether google violates those claims or not. What I'm saying is that: (a) some claims and protections have been granted, (b) it's Apple's right to protect them until/unless these protections are overturned/invalidated, and (c) I have no sympathy for people violating legitimate claims. This whole sub-thread is about "striking first" makes Apple a bully which is total bullshit. They're striking first because they're the person getting copied, that's how the dynamic works. "the first Android phone (G1) didn't resemble the iPhone more than any other smartphone on the market. Most people that I knew were comparing it to the Sidekick when it first released." That's rich, every review of the G1 I can find compares it directly with the iphone. Custom time limit a google search.
- Pewpewarrows 15y ago
  Misleading image is misleading. This is what the first Android phone looked like: http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2008/10/android1a.jpg http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2008/10/androi... Plenty of handsets had full touch-screens before the iPhone came out. The only difference being that the iPhone decided to ditch any hardware keyboard option. Oh wait, what's that on the knockoff? A hardware keyboard option, and almost every other button from the pre-release prototype as well. Please. The arguments are childish now. Every manufacturer takes inspiration from devices on the current market. Apple included. Only they decided to go and start suing everyone left and right.
  - czhiddy 15y ago
    I'm curious why that image is "misleading." Is that not a photo of an early pre-release Android prototype?
    - Pewpewarrows 15y ago
      The second image, not the first.
  - Steko 15y ago
    "Only they decided to go and start suing everyone left and right." The idea that Apple was the first person to sue anyone in mobile is laughable. http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_l9ucqq8ZMD1qa34geo1_r3_500.jpg http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_l9ucqq8ZMD1qa34geo1_r3_500...
shawndumas 15y ago
https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/_1IECTAB2-to/TWV9IKxwQOI/AAAAAAAAAmQ/JPM8CJ3LIEk/google-android.jpg https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/_1IECTAB2-to/TWV9IKxwQOI/A...

Steko 15y ago

"Aggressively clone as in...? " As in completely overhauled the device from a blackberry knock off to an iphone knock off: http://random.andrewwarner.com/what-googles-android-looked-like-before-and-after-the-launch-of-iphone/ http://random.andrewwarner.com/what-googles-android-looked-l... "Hate to break it to you, but iOS wasn't the first to do any of those" I'm not making any claim that (1) iOS was first for any of those or that (2) whatever claims Apple is making are protectable or not or (3) whether google violates those claims or not. What I'm saying is that: (a) some claims and protections have been granted, (b) it's Apple's right to protect them until/unless these protections are overturned/invalidated, and (c) I have no sympathy for people violating legitimate claims. This whole sub-thread is about "striking first" makes Apple a bully which is total bullshit. They're striking first because they're the person getting copied, that's how the dynamic works. "the first Android phone (G1) didn't resemble the iPhone more than any other smartphone on the market. Most people that I knew were comparing it to the Sidekick when it first released." That's rich, every review of the G1 I can find compares it directly with the iphone. Custom time limit a google search.

Pewpewarrows 15y ago
Misleading image is misleading. This is what the first Android phone looked like: http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2008/10/android1a.jpg http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2008/10/androi... Plenty of handsets had full touch-screens before the iPhone came out. The only difference being that the iPhone decided to ditch any hardware keyboard option. Oh wait, what's that on the knockoff? A hardware keyboard option, and almost every other button from the pre-release prototype as well. Please. The arguments are childish now. Every manufacturer takes inspiration from devices on the current market. Apple included. Only they decided to go and start suing everyone left and right.
- czhiddy 15y ago
  I'm curious why that image is "misleading." Is that not a photo of an early pre-release Android prototype?
  - Pewpewarrows 15y ago
    The second image, not the first.
- Steko 15y ago
  "Only they decided to go and start suing everyone left and right." The idea that Apple was the first person to sue anyone in mobile is laughable. http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_l9ucqq8ZMD1qa34geo1_r3_500.jpg http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_l9ucqq8ZMD1qa34geo1_r3_500...

shawndumas 15y ago

https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/_1IECTAB2-to/TWV9IKxwQOI/AAAAAAAAAmQ/JPM8CJ3LIEk/google-android.jpg https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/_1IECTAB2-to/TWV9IKxwQOI/A...