The notion that scholars have “debunked” the mushroom hypothesis is ludicrous given that they don’t postulate a hypothesis that is any more reasonable. The ide

The notion that scholars have “debunked” the mushroom hypothesis is ludicrous given that they don’t postulate a hypothesis that is any more reasonable. The idea that it is a “stylized” tree seems preposterous to me given each branch ending in a cap. If it was just the top, ok. But every branch? It looks like a clump of mushrooms growing out of the ground, Occam’s razor and what not.That doesn’t mean it’s a magic mushroom, but maybe mushrooms had some sort of significance to the artist/church/region etc.