3 ms·
> and continuously improving without many sudden changes that force one to relearn how to use it. LOL. Have we used the same GNOME? Their evolution is nothing
by kevinherron 5y ago
> and continuously improving without many sudden changes that force one to relearn how to use it.
LOL. Have we used the same GNOME? Their evolution is nothing but removing features and maximizing useless padding.
- AnIdiotOnTheNet 5y agoI'd have to agree. GNOME is notorious for this. We used to joke on slashdot over a decade ago about how one day GNOME would just have a single giant "do stuff" button.
- marcodiego 5y agoI remember that. And I also remember people commenting that an UI with a single button that does exactly what is expected would be a supreme UI.
- kylebyproxy 5y agoObligatory The Onion: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BnLbv6QYcA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BnLbv6QYcA
- Spivak 5y agoWhat features are you missing? Because I've had to tweak some dconf settings over the years but I've never found myself wanting something I could do before but is now impossible.
- reedlaw 5y agoI'm speaking primarily of GNOME 3 and above. I didn't use earlier versions much.
- hulitu 5y agoGnome 2 was the last usable Gnome version. And for KDE was KDE 3.