Energy security is not negotiable. It is perfectly defensible to state that and that energy consumption is unlikely to decrease. Nuclear power is much more sust

Energy security is not negotiable. It is perfectly defensible to state that and that energy consumption is unlikely to decrease. Nuclear power is much more sustainable, but alas people spent 40 years attacking that industry so we are way behind in it > was a recent UK gov report suggesting dropping meat consumption, or self flagellation as you might call it. yes i saw that, and it is a disgrace. Governments taxing food is not acceptable > No citations or justification? For what? a basic logical statement? That if power is largely renewable and even if not other sources are used to smooth peak capacity and stop the grid crashing, then the carbon footprint of said energy is not relevant.