4 ms·

> there is a "shortage of qualified engineers" Do we still believe this is true? I mean, if that were true, then why Google (probably the IT company in need of

> there is a "shortage of qualified engineers" Do we still believe this is true? I mean, if that were true, then why Google (probably the IT company in need of the most talented engineers out there) is thinking about applying a measure that will scare away their most talented engineers? It doesn't hold. If there were a "shortage of qualified engineers", Google would have already said "all of our engineers can work from home if they want to. The ones who want to work from our offices can do so as well". I mean, that's the best strategy to keep and attract the best of the best, isn't it?

dboreham 5y ago
Because whoever is imposing the salary reduction is not the person who will suffer the consequences of the company not having good engineers. They're likely high fiving due to meeting their KPI.
throwaway894345 5y ago
> Do we still believe this is true? No, hence the rest of the sentence: > which is a political way of saying the software industry is underpaid already To be clear, it's FAANG who are saying there is a shortage of qualified engineers in their campaign to procure more foreign labor, but really this means they don't want to have to pay domestic engineers what they're worth (they want more H1-B visas to increase the supply and thus decrease the unit cost of engineers--with the nice bonus that H1-B holders are more easily abused because the employer has the power to effectively have these holders deported). > is thinking about applying a measure that will scare away their most talented engineers? It doesn't hold. A couple of possibilities: 1. Google is fallible 2. Google may be exceptional in the software industry (e.g., they may be okay with some attrition because they're playing a longer game than others in the industry, or perhaps because they already pay top-tier salaries and don't believe attrition will affect them)
tester756 5y ago
there's still shitton of skilled people that are interested in working for Google

dboreham 5y ago

Because whoever is imposing the salary reduction is not the person who will suffer the consequences of the company not having good engineers. They're likely high fiving due to meeting their KPI.

throwaway894345 5y ago

> Do we still believe this is true? No, hence the rest of the sentence: > which is a political way of saying the software industry is underpaid already To be clear, it's FAANG who are saying there is a shortage of qualified engineers in their campaign to procure more foreign labor, but really this means they don't want to have to pay domestic engineers what they're worth (they want more H1-B visas to increase the supply and thus decrease the unit cost of engineers--with the nice bonus that H1-B holders are more easily abused because the employer has the power to effectively have these holders deported). > is thinking about applying a measure that will scare away their most talented engineers? It doesn't hold. A couple of possibilities: 1. Google is fallible 2. Google may be exceptional in the software industry (e.g., they may be okay with some attrition because they're playing a longer game than others in the industry, or perhaps because they already pay top-tier salaries and don't believe attrition will affect them)

tester756 5y ago

there's still shitton of skilled people that are interested in working for Google