If you think that highlighting how a statistic is misleading* is moving the goalposts then I'm happy to continually move goalposts, but you might learn or use t

If you think that highlighting how a statistic is misleading* is moving the goalposts then I'm happy to continually move goalposts, but you might learn or use the definition of "moving the goalposts" correctly in the meanwhile. If you don't like the fact that the studies show no evidence that masks are of benefit, that's your problem, but don't try and attribute any fallacy to me without providing a damn sight more reasoning and evidence as it gives the appearance of you wishing to smear me to cover up what you lack, a valid, considered, and persuasive argument. * or worse, being used to mislead, which I don't think was happening from @tablespoon but I wouldn't put it past those who'd jump in with ad hominem and think it was a worthy contribution to the debate.