Calling arming a tank a "historical restoration project" is already quite an example of Olympics-level mental gymnastics. And no, it's not comparable to selling

Calling arming a tank a "historical restoration project" is already quite an example of Olympics-level mental gymnastics. And no, it's not comparable to selling pot either. > The law was not written for these kinds of people. It was written for people who are actually up to no good. What "good" purpose does arming a tank have then? Authorities don't like to wait and find out, and that's not unreasonable in any way.