3 ms·
Arguing against zero cost abstractions should use as a counter argument an abstraction that is advertised as zero cost. I do not think wrapped types are so adv
by worik 5y ago
Arguing against zero cost abstractions should use as a counter argument an abstraction that is advertised as zero cost.
I do not think wrapped types are so advertised.
- quotemstr 5y agoWrapper types in C++ really are zero cost. Rust is simply broken here, sorry. That happens when you throw away 30 years of work to reinvent the wheel because you like variable names before types or something.
- adwn 5y ago> That happens when you throw away 30 years of work to reinvent the wheel because you like variable names before types or something. That's an extremely ignorant and incorrect take on Rust, and your phrasing makes me believe that you're doing this intentionally.