3 ms·
Well… the waterfall would be gone on second load with cache-control:immutable, so it's not that terrible. And it would provide powerful motivation to trim that
by floatboth 5y ago
Well… the waterfall would be gone on second load with cache-control:immutable, so it's not that terrible. And it would provide powerful motivation to trim that dependency tree :D
- e1g 5y agoThis requires URLs/filenames to be immutable, typically by having a hash of the content in the filename. Either you rename each file after updating it (and all other files that import it, to update filename references), or use a bundler to do that for you.
- jeswin 5y agoStill unusably bad. First load performance is vital, and a very large number of visitors come without cached files. It's going to get worse as the battle between privacy tools and ad networks intensify. I totally agree with you on pruning dependency trees though.