3 ms·
Hasn't this already been tested in a US court? I can't remember what it was called, but since you're giving away your privacy to a third party, you've given up
by alfiedotwtf 5y ago
Hasn't this already been tested in a US court? I can't remember what it was called, but since you're giving away your privacy to a third party, you've given up right for privacy period.
- schoen 5y agoTwo different legal doctrines. https://olemiss.edu/depts/ncjrl/pdf/PrivateSearchDoctrine.pdf https://olemiss.edu/depts/ncjrl/pdf/PrivateSearchDoctrine.pd... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_doctrine https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_doctrine
- alfiedotwtf 5y agoThank you. Third-party doctrine was what I was thinking of. So I'm guessing putting things in your phone will soon be seen as crossing into third-part territory if it hasn't already.
- nullc 5y agoIt's not hard to imagine that this kind of automated scanning might be used as an argument for that: "Clearly you had no expectation of privacy for information on your phone..."
- alfiedotwtf 5y agoBingo. If you chose devices that aren't open, you're chosing to give away your freedoms. I makes the jump to LineageOS earlier this year because I could see the signs that Apple were getting to comfortable with government. Now, I've got the confirmation I was right in my hunch