Thanks for the link to the previous discussion. Looking at the numbers in there, I don’t see how this conversation isn’t about overpopulation. We need such mass

Thanks for the link to the previous discussion. Looking at the numbers in there, I don’t see how this conversation isn’t about overpopulation. We need such massive equivalents of land because there are too many of us, and we value living high quality lives (high standards of living with substantial consumption). The alternative is that everyone lives very constrained lives but I don’t think that is feasible or even desirable.