I think I agree with you :-) > Unfortunately, making it (doesn't matter what "it" is) a partisan issue has been shown to work, over and over and over. It's dep

I think I agree with you :-) > Unfortunately, making it (doesn't matter what "it" is) a partisan issue has been shown to work, over and over and over. It's depressingly predictable at this point. People go into all sorts of mental contortions and doublethink to explain why the stance "their" side has taken is the "right" one. You are of course right. But since this issue is already owned by democrats/progressives/whatever and since conservative thought leaders have painted themselves into a corner maybe I should say: we shouldn't say anything that makes it an even more partisan issue. The more we can avoid the soreness of doing what "the other side want" and focus on "this is beneficial for me/us/"our country" - right here and now, next quarter etc the better. > People and industries who have more to lose from a greener economy have no hesitation in employing these tactics to stall or block change, and influence people. Of course, which is why we need to outsmart them :-)