> Would you mind avoiding the tortured use of terminology from CS to describe what is not a CS problem? You haven't mentioned which terminology you're talking

> Would you mind avoiding the tortured use of terminology from CS to describe what is not a CS problem? You haven't mentioned which terminology you're talking about but assuming it is one of combinatorial explosion, compression, framing or heuristics; these are not computer science exclusive jargon, these are information processing terms, something both humans and computers do, and as such used in cognitive science contexts pretty extensively and correctly. > This occurs too often on HN and often conceals gross misunderstanding behind a veneer of technical jargon. Unless you're ready to point out what the gross misunderstanding was, your point is moot.