3 ms·
> but about whether someone else could... Why would they be able to? I haven't heard of any such exploits for Signal, and their crypto as well as their app-rel
by approxim8ion 5y ago
> but about whether someone else could...
Why would they be able to? I haven't heard of any such exploits for Signal, and their crypto as well as their app-related code is open, well-documented, and repeatedly audited.
- nolok 5y agoYou're focusing on signal for some reason, ignoring the larger point being made Also: > their crypto as well as their app-related code is open, well-documented, and repeatedly audited. And since nobody builds their executable from source, it doesn't at all guarantee anything about the version I have on my phone right now, unless I do a lot of extra check that virtually no one will do on every update. If whatever entity* aiming for me chose to target a specific update at me on the store that did a clear copy send on the side, I would never know. * Say, China aiming for a chinese user on whatever chinese app store is popular at the moment, to take the most obvious (but clearly not only) exemple
- approxim8ion 5y ago> And since nobody builds their executable from source How many people build gnupg or gpg-agent from source? > Whatever entity Seems like something your local apt/pacman repository mirror host could do too. It's a fair concern. I'm not trying to be disingenuous, sorry if it comes off that way. I'm just focusing on Signal because you wrote "modern IM software".
- nolok 5y ago> How many people build gnupg or gpg-agent from source? More people than those build signal from source > Seems like something your local apt/pacman repository mirror host could do too. Which is why I focus on build from source, and more people fo it for pgp than any im software out there.