3 ms·
This seems rather an odd argument to me. Kythc gets to reverse engineer Taylor machines but Taylor cannot reverse engineer Kytch? I’m all on the side of right
by generj 5y ago
This seems rather an odd argument to me.
Kythc gets to reverse engineer Taylor machines but Taylor cannot reverse engineer Kytch?
I’m all on the side of right to repair but surely reverse engineering ought to be permissible for all sides?
- postalrat 5y agoBoth sides are lying about the intentions.
- stopnamingnuts 5y ago+1 for beautifully summing up in seven words the key takeaway of the vast majority of public discourse.
- InvaderFizz 5y agoI'm in agreement, but what is painfully unsaid throughout the article are the why. It seems pretty apparent to me that Taylor is getting their hands on the Kytch device for the purpose of developing countermeasures to Kytch devices functioning at all.
- kevin_thibedeau 5y agoScummy as it may be, they have that right.
- kuraudo 5y agoFor now; new laws should be created to take away that right.
- enragedcacti 5y agoProbably not: https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2021/07/ftc-ramp-law-enforcement-against-illegal-repair-restrictions https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2021/07/ftc-r...
- dhimes 5y agoIt will be interesting to see if Taylor counter-sues, claiming "trade secrets."